Your Party’s First Congress, held in Liverpool, was intended to mark a defining moment for this emerging political movement, positioning itself as a fresh alternative to traditional politics. However, the event instead revealed a series of internal tensions, disagreements, and visible divisions within the organisation. What was meant to establish the party’s identity, structure, and goals ultimately highlighted its underlying struggles. While members had hoped the congress would bring unity, the final outcomes and overall atmosphere suggested a far more uncertain path ahead.
Your Party’s First Congress was marked by internal tensions from the very start.
The first Congress of Your Party was meant to solidify its identity, yet it revealed deep internal tensions. The vote to confirm the party’s name, “Your Party”, received only 37% support, far from enough to unify members. Alternative names proposed during the Congress gained little enthusiasm, highlighting the fragile consensus within Your Party.
Many activists feel the chosen name does not reflect the movement’s ambitions, seeing it as a compromise rather than a bold choice. This Congress showcased disagreements over direction, leaving Your Party still struggling with its self-definition. The early stage of the movement makes these tensions more visible, signaling challenges ahead for unity within Your Party.
What could have been a symbolic moment to strengthen identity instead highlighted vulnerabilities. The Congress exposed doubts about strategy and coordination, while supporters of Your Party worry about cohesion. Internal divisions remain a pressing issue as the movement grows, showing that Your Party still has work to do to consolidate its vision.
At Your Party’s First Congress, governance reform took center stage in the debates.
A key focus of the Congress was the vote on leadership structure, a decisive step for Your Party’s future. Members approved a collective model with 51.6% support, moving away from the traditional single-leader approach. This choice, discussed at length during the Congress, aims to make Your Party more participatory and horizontal.
The Central Executive Committee will mostly include ordinary members, with elected MPs barred from chairing. Advocates argue this reflects the founding principles of Your Party and encourages broader engagement. The Congress emphasized collective responsibility, signaling a deliberate break from conventional hierarchies.
Despite approval, the governance model is not unanimous. Critics fear collective leadership could slow decisions and intensify internal friction. Within the Congress, debates highlighted these concerns, showing that Your Party must carefully manage tensions to maintain effective decision-making.
Fractures, Controversies and Uncertainty About What Comes Next
The congress also brought to light several expulsions of members accused of violating party guidelines, further fuelling tensions and suspicion. One founding member even boycotted an entire day of the congress, accusing the leadership of relying on opaque internal practices.At the same time, several MPs left the party, citing a lack of clarity and stability within the leadership. Their departure further undermines the movement’s credibility and reinforces the perception that the party remains insufficiently structured, a concern echoed by many activists uncertain about its political direction.
These developments raise important questions about the party’s ability to compete within the highly competitive landscape of British politics. With internal distrust, entrenched divisions and an unstable approach to governance, Your Party will need to rebuild quickly and seek a stronger internal consensus if it hopes to convince voters in the long term.